tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4930065815010914887.post8659489292018516811..comments2023-07-01T05:04:43.376-07:00Comments on Really Bad Eggs: L is for LackeyBlack Vulmeahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04270071699114783644noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4930065815010914887.post-54059456475031229572012-04-13T21:23:23.309-07:002012-04-13T21:23:23.309-07:00I've toyed with adapting the 1e AD&D hench...I've toyed with adapting the 1e <i>AD&D</i> henchmen rules for lackeys-as-armed-retainers. That would make a good post for next month.<br /><br />As far as ordinary sevants go, I rule that a character gets a number of sevants equal to their Social Rank - 1D6. The cost of these servants is rolled into the monthly upkeep, and they are typically not able to go 'adventuring' with the player character - only a lackey may do so.<br /><br />I'm also working on some rules for property, which will include guidelines for the number and types of servants associated with a townhouse, villa, and so forth.Black Vulmeahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04270071699114783644noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4930065815010914887.post-76302074376934529632012-04-13T19:37:59.769-07:002012-04-13T19:37:59.769-07:00hmm. A different kind of L. ok. like it.hmm. A different kind of L. ok. like it.Sandra Tylerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13191775335774130719noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4930065815010914887.post-50350874236315058152012-04-13T13:31:09.155-07:002012-04-13T13:31:09.155-07:00With the exception of their being listed in the ch...With the exception of their being listed in the character creation rules, I find the lack of mention of Lackeys one of the great disappointments in FB's rules-as-written. But, like mistresses and other things, I wonder if I just lack the context (either En Garde or a sufficient spread of source material) to fill in the (seemingly deliberate) lacunae.<br /><br />Any thoughts, Mike?Flambeauxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00133131881423202010noreply@blogger.com